I am the way to improve the structure, click on the top of the “attention”, adhere to share technology for you every day, I reply “01” private message, send you a programmer growth and advancement gift package.
Writing in the front
Talking about original article, the current environment it’s really hard for you, his article elaborate creation, has become a major disaster area of communities in handling user copied, actually many similar zhihu can contribute quality answer a master because the endless copying his hard to write articles, angry no longer writing, the current network rights protection is also more difficult, rights protection cost is higher, as opposed to a, Weibo accounts and public accounts that rely on plagiarized articles are thriving.
Today to talk about their own recent original rights protection experience and feelings.
Technical creation experience
I like to summarize my work, and I like to record my work problems, so that I can review them later. Since I was a student registered CSDN and Iteye community, until a few years ago, his blog has been recorded in Iteye communities: four dimensional space (www.iteye.com/blog/user/f…
Later, with the gradual accumulation of project development and management experience, THERE are more dimensions of ideas to precipitation; At the same time, the ITEYE community was acquired by CSDN, and community functionality iteration and operations were virtually suspended.
Therefore, in the past six months, I changed my wechat official account “The Way to Improve Architecture” to focus on software architecture research, technical learning and career growth. As a major personal technology precipitation, I will simultaneously share it with other mainstream technology communities, hoping to share my technical experience and summary to influence more people.
Start the first original rights
The reason for the incident is that around October 2020, I contacted Gitchat and contributed an original article “Here is how I analyze idempotent problems for my colleagues” on my official account. As a result, its review editor ruled that there were similar articles.
The original is their own original text was directly carried by others, but also others marked as original, shocked ~
At the time, Gitchat provided a link to the same article:
www.pianshen.com/article/956…
Blog.csdn.net/wuhuagu\_wu…
This involves CSDN community user ID: Wuhuagu_Wuhuaguo and technical information aggregation website.
At that time, in order to report the plagiarists in the CSDN community, I still struggled to retrieve the unused account password (registered many years ago but not used much). I complained according to the rules, and soon the article was taken down and dealt with.
At the same time, I sent an Email to the technical information aggregator site above, and it was quickly deleted.
Here to mention: in fact, the article is a famous reprint of the source (but the CSDN community user ID: Wuhuagu_Wuhuaguo original actually plagiarism), and promptly deleted the email for processing.
Since the article has also been published on infoQ community writing platform, after learning the handling situation, community user operations students actively follow up to solve the infringement, here to give a big thumbs up!
Blog move CSDN
After the above complaint rights protection, think about whether to move the original blog to CSDN, so should be able to avoid others repeat the content of the publication and facilitate their own complaints.
So in October 2020, I applied to move my blog. In short, I succeeded in moving after all kinds of difficulties. At the same time, with the help of the community assistant, my articles on the public account can be synchronized to CSDN blog at any time.
However, the fact is not so simple as imagined.
Even so, in the first two days of conveniently searching, found that there is still a lot of plagiarism handling.
Case1:
My public account original article: I am so to colleagues analysis idempotent problems, published time: 2020-6-6
Below is a screenshot of the plagiarist’s article with revised title, published on 2020-12-08
Case2:
MySQL slow query (middle) : Correct posture, do you get? Post time: 2021-1-7
The following is a screenshot of the plagiarist’s article, published at 2021-1-17
Marked the original but the end also retained my wechat public number, I do not know is the report? Or should thank him to my public number of propaganda?
Case3:
My public account original article: interview common four kinds of algorithm ideas, all here, release time: 2021-1-15
The following is the screenshot of the plagiarist’s article, with the image information with watermark removed, published at 2021-1-17
Case4:
My public account original article: in the face of Kafka consumption is not to force, how to easily solve it? Time of publication: 2021-1-24
The following is a screenshot of the plagiarist’s article. The title has been modified and the watermarked image information has been removed
What’s even more funny is that the big brother, who is certified as a corporate employee, added course marketing content to the end of the article.
I’m drunk, too. I didn’t think I could play like this.
Enterprise authentication users dare to play like this? The community seems to be really tolerant.
Limited to space, HERE I will not list one by one, suddenly feel good tired.
Have a friend to comfort me to say: “someone carries your article explanation to write well ah, ha ha ha…”
I:…
This week, I decided to take this situation to the next level. Some of the articles listed above are now offline, and some users may have their accounts blocked.
The platform attitude
As for the plagiarism situation of the article handling, after feedback to CSDN user operation classmate, the general response is similar to this:
1, support you to complain about the article, after the complaint we verify no problem will be deleted to deal with……
2, our community has always paid attention to copyright protection, for the copyright protection of the site, we have been continuing to follow up……
In particular, I would like to ask, for the article handling plagiarism can only rely on the author’s own screening efforts? As an established technology community, the responsibility and responsibility of the platform? Is only responsible for deleting posts?
In fact, more uncomfortable than their original articles were carried plagiarism is actually: the exposure of carrying articles is even higher than their original articles, to tears….
Because some of them are the official private domain traffic recommendation blog authors, will give a certain amount of traffic support.
Really do not understand some marketing numbers can be easily through the official certification audit.
What I want to say is:
- It is an important part of the operation of a mature community platform, whether it is the complaint handling of plagiarized handling content or the self-recommendation feedback of personal blog. If a patronizing, not serious attitude to solve the problem, that impact can be imagined.
- It is recommended not to wait for the problem to be exposed on other platforms and have a bad impact before willing to take responsibility to solve the problem. Also don’t wait for an accident to take the intern classmate, said that she is not sensible, the problem handling experience is insufficient. Since there is permission to respond to the message, that is the official spokesman, is authoritative effect.
- In fact, as content creators, the original intention is to make progress with the community, and both sides must be able to talk to each other on an equal footing, rather than ignoring problems and not giving feedback.
Have you heard of the “broken window effect”?
Take a building with a few broken Windows for example. If those Windows are not repaired, there will probably be vandals who will break more Windows. Eventually they would even break into the building, and if they found it uninhabited, they might settle there or set fire to it. One wall, if some graffiti is not washed away, will soon be covered with chaos and unsightly things; A sidewalk with a little bit of paper will soon have more trash, and eventually people will take their trash for granted and leave it on the ground.
If we shout slogans every day: “We want to build a community of 100 million technical people”, “we are working hard to create copyright protection”…
And without the appearance of some substantial change, ask, do we need to have any illusions about it?
Other things
Some other blogging communities are even worse, mainly because you don’t see any complaints on the page, you can’t get in touch with the site management, and it’s slow and difficult to even get an Email to the site management team.
Look at this one:
My public account original article: an understanding of Redis high performance IO multiplexing, release time: 2020-6-20
Below is a screenshot of the plagiarist’s article, with the watermarked image information removed, published on 2020-10-29
No way, register an account to complain and report, there is no report function then leave a message, DID not expect the design of the product is so embarrassing.
In addition to not being able to comment, new users are also not allowed to initiate community feedback within one day after registration, again “admire” under the blog garden PMS!!
No way, send an Email to the community content team to report (it has been removed as of press time)
In fact, many personal blog sites will grab excellent technical articles to fill the content, these are more difficult to follow up, in short, the original rights have a long way to go.
National policy
On January 22, 2021, the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) issued the newly revised Regulations on the Administration of Public Account Information Services for Internet Users, which will come into force on February 22. This new regulation has five chapters and 23 articles, which respectively regulate the platform, operator and supervision and management.
The official code is here: see the official website of the Cyberspace Administration of China
Link: www.cac.gov.cn/2021-01/22/…
The new regulations have made requirements for community and personal information operations, clarified the main responsibilities of information service platforms and production operators, and made resolutions on dealing with plagiarism and other issues.
Although the new rules were recently announced and are not expected to take effect until February 22, platforms have already begun cracking down on plagiarism.
The wechat public platform and the Tiaotiao platform have started to detect the duplicate content of posts, and found that the duplicate content is always not promoted and published. I believe this is also the content platform in the future unified normative basic requirements.
Return to the beginner’s mind
Talked about so much, actually still want to return to say oneself write technical article original intention.
In fact, I wrote this last year in this post about why I started my Tech account:
Since the public began to try this value output, you need to consider clearly, what can you give to your others? What do you use to attract attention?
All communities, by their very nature, aim to provide services, whether free or paid. What services can you provide? What’s the direction? What does it bring them? These are all things you need to think about ahead of time.
I personally feel that the public number is a slow accumulation of things, as long as adhere to it, to the final result will not be too bad.
For the rights protection process, sometimes the appropriate strong some is not a bad thing, but will give yourself to win some of their own respect. I believe that the following period of time will also experience some unpleasant and bumpy process, but the road is in the foot, the direction in front, keep the original mind and move forward bravely!
It’s a difficult road, and you’ve chosen it, so stick to it as long as you can. Come on!
Believe that those who do not bring you down, will let you go more steadily!
– END –
Author: The Path to Architecture Improvement, focus on software architecture research, technical learning and personal growth, follow and private message me “01”, send you a programmer growth and advancement gift package.
The article was first published in the public number of the same name “the way to improve the structure”, the original link: talk about my original rights protection two or three things
Thanks for reading!