Hello everyone, recently I have been inspired to write a little scripture for you. This time the content will be more in-depth, do not understand it does not matter, you can click a collection.
A good friend of mine is looking for a job recently. During the conversation, I thought of some contents about interview and resume, so I sorted out my thoughts and wrote this article to share with you.
A period of the past
If you have been through several interviews, you will find that our performance and results are different and unpredictable from one interview to the next. There are a lot of factors that go into the outcome other than the performance, and sometimes you feel like everything is going well from the start to the end. It’s all about what you know, and both the interviewer and the boss get on very well with each other. Sometimes it will feel very bad, how all bad, even if passed also have a feeling of being looked down upon.
Take myself as an example, several years ago WHEN I was looking for an internship, I once encountered such a thing. I delivered the internship positions at Both Alibaba and Tencent, both through internal promotion. Among them, Ali is the hot ali Mom. As we all know, advertising is the core of e-commerce and the source of income. Tencent cast the post I forgot, anyway is not the game, I estimate should be general post. And what happens? I ali not only passed the interview, but also received a good review. What about Tencent? The resume failed, and the interview opportunity failed, because the layman HR evaluated the resume and gave it a B.
In addition to me, there was another partner who went very well in the interview with Tencent and got the offer in three out of five. It left me scratching my head, and at one point, I even had a bad impression of Tencent, so much so that I never applied for a position there again. But more importantly, I wonder, why? You can hang up on me. There’s got to be a reason, right?
It wasn’t until I became an interviewer myself that I figured out why. That’s my first point. Do you really know the company and position you want to work for?
Enemy and know yourself
This is a killer question that I suspect most people have never heard of. I used to be the same. What’s the style of the company? What kind of candidate do you like? According to the job description, it is most likely to do new business or maintain the old system? What strengths do you think their interviewers might be looking for? What strengths do you have? What do you value in this position?
A lot of people are blind when they send resumes, always holding a try and see the state of mind. Some people think I’m just going to try, and if I pass, I’ll keep shooting. There are also some people when job-hopping, I first look at each side, after the interview and then decide whether to go, or after the interview and then compare to make a choice. Well, it’s not that this is necessarily bad, but I personally think we can be a little more specific about our expectations.
A very simple example, a lot of people have suffered including me. You’re unhappy with your current company and want to move on, so you go out for an interview. You’re not particularly prepared, so you just try it out. Because you had a good background, although you did not play well, but still managed to get the offer: 20% increase in your current base. Are you going or not?
Go, feel rise a little little, do not go in the present company to stay already very afflicting, say 20% also is money, do not go total feel loss. So a lot of people will tangle after a period of time or choose to go, go after a long time and regret, think that the low, others jumped 50%. Or they find out they don’t like what they’re doing, move from one job to another, and waste a job opportunity without getting a big raise.
There is a saying that the only way to solve a dilemma is not to be trapped in the dilemma, so it is very necessary to think clearly before taking action, to know your own ideas first, and to collect more information.
Take me as an example, I had little project experience when I graduated, and the main highlights were in the algorithm side. This situation is best suited to go to the likes of the algorithm capabilities of foreign companies, such as Microsoft, Google, what. This is followed by Baidu and Alibaba, which are more focused on fundamentals and personal potential, and finally Tencent, which is pure business, pure business, and likes to focus on the projects candidates have done. It was obvious that Tencent and I were not on the right path at that time. If I had thought clearly, there was no need to try. It was a waste of time.
Unfortunately, many people do not understand their own strengths and goals, but also the requirements and preferences of the other party, which is very uncomfortable. Interviews and recruitment are all luck, it’s easy to lose, and it took me twice to finally learn the lesson.
If you can figure this out, the rest is easy. For example, if you want to go to Ali, what do you do?
It’s very simple. First, find out what Ali likes. What does Ali like? Just look at the values of the company: solid, smart. That is, both to the performance and character, to the performance is to say that the foundation is good, solid technical ability, to character is to say that can bear hardships, have the spirit of hard work. If you look more closely, big companies care about something called potential. What is potential, to put it bluntly, is the trend and direction of development, know what you want, know how to get it, and have the ability to get it.
Once we had those questions figured out, it came naturally. We incorporated them into our resumes and created a persona that would hit the interviewer’s lap. You obviously have a much better chance of getting in.
A person
It’s not just celebrities that have personality.everyone has it, too. When you see a big man on the street with dragons tattooed on both arms, your first thought is that he’s a big brother. Similarly, the first time the interviewer sees your resume, it says that you have participated in XX system, responsible for XX module and completed XX function. The first reaction is that this is a typical plain programmer, if the skills are OK, just hired to take over a hole in the team.
On the other hand, if your resume is weak and looks weak in many areas, it’s easy for an interviewer to think you’re unreliable and a bit of a bombshell if he or she isn’t fooled. You may arouse the interviewer’s desire to win and lose until you can’t answer the question. All of this is possible, and I say this not to say that we’re going to build a person or something, but to say that we need to think about this:
If you were in the interviewer’s position, looking at your resume, how would you feel? What kind of person do you think wrote this resume?
I’m being a little vain here, but let me give you another example. I’ve seen resumes like this before, and they have a lot of projects, all kinds of things. I had a face recognition project, and I did my master’s thesis in a field I didn’t know anything about, and it took a lot of space. I did kaggle competitions, I did a small website search function, and so on.
So the question is, what is the setting of this resume? The answer is no. I have no idea what he’s trying to say. Because he’s a search algorithm engineer, and since he’s an algorithm engineer, his resume should look like someone who’s really good at search, or has a lot of experience in search. At the very least, the person should be interested in searching, right? Rather than listing a bunch of irrelevant content that makes it unclear if you did a search at all. There are plenty of examples, too many resumes with back-end experience on the front end and awards on the back end.
Frankly speaking, or reluctant to throw, feel a little achievement should be written out, for fear of others do not know. In fact, less is more, contracted often not simple. Many bulls often say that writing a resume to highlight the key points, to write the shining point, in fact, the same thing. If you write too much irrelevant stuff, people will not know what you are good at and what kind of person you are. It is better to cut it down.
Control the expected
The final point is to manage expectations. Sometimes it’s not a good thing to overdo it.
I shared a joke with a colleague who used to work in Silicon Valley. He said that if you are going to meet Google or Facebook in the future, make sure you don’t put ACM experience on your resume. Because you put this in, they’re going to ask you about red-black trees, stretch trees, these kind of hard data structures. If you don’t, they’ll probably just ask you some LeetCode questions or hashMaps or whatever.
It sounds like a joke, but it’s actually true. It is the same as what I just said. I wrote acm award information in my resume, which tells the interviewer that I am a person with strong algorithm. For companies like Google and Facebook, where algorithms are a big deal and there’s no shortage of them, you’ll want to find someone who knows how to talk to you. If you once play failure, the other side will be disappointed with you, will directly affect your interview results. On the other hand, if you don’t write about it, you’ll be asked for your algorithmic skills as an ordinary engineer, and it turns out that your understanding of algorithms is almost as deep as Acmer’s, so he’ll obviously look at you and think you’re a good amateur for that.
If the domestic company, relatively less emphasis on the algorithm, you can add this as a plus, generally speaking, will not encounter a particularly difficult situation. This example may not apply to everyone, but I think the point is clear: What you put on your resume, what you don’t put on it, and how you put it on it matters a lot. The core logic is not how to write well, but what expectations you want to give to the person you’re writing to.
Imperceptibly wrote a lot, but is the words of the heart, hope to be able to give is looking for a job or is about to look for a job of friends play a little role.
I sincerely wish you all a fruitful day. If you still like today’s content, please join us in a three-way support.
Original link, ask a concern
This article is formatted using MDNICE
– END –