In recent days, twitter users have been Posting calls for complaints to the Apple Store about alleged fraud. They provided the following evidence:
Is it fraud when I say BCH is the real Bitcoin?
1. You are showing Bitcoin Wallet, but the first sentence in the description is “Default Bitcoin Cash wallet”. Fraud!
2. Click to display Bitcoin address, but it shows the address of Bitcoin Cash. Fraud!
Is it fraud when I say BCH is the real Bitcoin?
3. Did not pay attention to the address when receiving BTC, resulting in the recharging of coins to the address of BCH, resulting in actual property losses. Fraud!
How does this affect the Bitcoin.com wallet?
Embarrassed!
I recommended this wallet to a graduate student and asked him to download it. Although he is a little white, his first words are “So low grade? Is it true?”
2 Pull hatred!
Bitcoin.com is a well-known company in the world, and its CEORoger Ver is one of the earliest bitcoin evangelists in the world. Being sued by users will damage the company’s public image and affect Roger’s personal reputation. Looks like a bunch of Core’s on the road.
3 money?
I have not investigated whether any users actually suffered economic losses in the process of buying or recharging BTC. If so, should Bitcoin.com cover the cost? No investigation, no voice. I’m not going to beep this one.
How serious is this?
More than 1,000 users have now formed a telegram group to Sue Bitcoin.com for fraud. Regardless of whether there is a 50 cent party involved, there must be some users who feel they have been “duped” and are unhappy with Bitcoin.com’s alleged “false propaganda”.
While all exchanges and wallet services referred to BTC as Bitcoin and BCH as Bitcoin Cash, Bitcoin.com took a different tack and simply assumed Bitcoin was BCH. Is this setting a new industry standard and leading people to the right path, or is it using its own advantages to forcibly brainwash people?
As a bitcoin friend who regards Roger as a bitcoin hero, I can’t comment on this. But it doesn’t matter, I have friends! Now let’s invite my friends to discuss this matter. To protect their privacy, I’ll call them 1A, 2B, 3C, 4D for now.
Things seem to be getting worse and worse. Now users are complaining to Google that Bitcoin.com is misleading consumers and demanding that they be removed from the search engine’s homepage. What do you think about it?
Does 2B know why these trolls attacked Bitcoin.com? Because they’re scared! They know BCH is on the right track. There is no need to pander to the masses, sooner or later they will join the BCH camp.
3C 2B Don’t call me names, but I feel like I’m cheating the consumer. People look at Bitcoin and want to buy BTC, not BCH. Bitcoin.com directly hides BTC, default Bitcoin is BCH, this is not artificial guide public cognition, mislead them?
4D I agree with the above statement. Peter, BU’s chief scientist, said that after August 1st, there were two types of bitcoin, BTC and BCH. Both sides can call themselves Bitcoin, but if you firmly believe that only one is the real bitcoin, you belong to a bitcoin cult. Is it fraud when I say BCH is the real Bitcoin?
2B What cult not cult! Only BCH is real Bitcoin! Those who think BTC is also bitcoin are deluded, they bought BTC is cheated. I call on Bitcoin.com to get rid of BTC and sell only BCH. Let’s see how those trolls pretend to be conned.
1A you’re getting a little extreme. Most people buy coins for BTC. I estimate that BTC business can account for more than 80% of wallet business, how can BTC company make money without it?
2 b make money? ! Bitcoin is the currency of the future! We are promoting the progress of human civilization, how can we care about a little profit. We stand for the truth. Look at Bitcoin.com why they don’t sell BTG, LBTC, because they are not bitcoin! So just sell BCH.
It’s ok to sell 3C only BCH, but let’s be clear. Bitcoin Cash (BCH) should be specified, not Bitcoin (BCH).
4D I agree with the above statement. Businesses should focus on user experience. Imagine a rookie who sees Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash on an exchange, downloads Bitcoin.com’s wallet, finds only Bitcoin in it, and decides to buy it. A look at the price, gee, bitcoin is so cheap? ! Is this a fake wallet? This will certainly reduce the credibility of the company, so I think it’s important to be clear.
1A comrades, you remember when BCH was born last August, ViaBtc was the only exchange that supported BCH. Other exchanges have announced that they will not support BCH or, as the case may be, support BCH. Eventually exchanges began to launch BCH because of demand from users. Now Bitcoin.com is not supporting BTC, just like the exchange that did not support BCH last year, killing users’ choice.
User 2B should not have so many choices. They were all wrong. Now probably 90% of people still think BCH is a fake coin, only BTC. We are helping them by letting them know that BCH is the real Bitcoin.
3C you’re right. Since most users don’t know there are two types of Bitcoin, it’s all the more important to tell them. Bitcoin.com did the right thing by stating on the page: Bitcoin Core(BTC) Bitcoin Cash(BCH) and even adding an icon at the end to make it clear. Of course, Bitcoin.com can show its support for BCH by putting BCH first. Is it fraud when I say BCH is the real Bitcoin? Download attachment save to album set as cover 1 hour ago upload 4D I agree with the above statement. Bitcoin represents a technology, a civilization. However, when we refer to currency, we should specify two types of coins: BTC and BCH. I don’t know if the coin is real or fake, but I know that the user’s money is not fake. They spend their money and deserve to get what they want.
2B Don’t cater to the crowd! BCH will win in the end! We want to lead the way! We want to set the industry standard!
1A/3C/4D 2B, are you thirsty? Stop beeping and buy you a drink. Go!