In order to Simplify Styling with Functional CSS, We had to stress Styling with Functional Styling Styling.

Look at the original

Do you dread styling your apps? Fear that a change might break the styles you crafted through many hours of labour? I’m here to tell you that there’s another way. Introducing functional CSS.

In this article I’ll explain what functional CSS is, show you how it compares to traditional CSS, and demonstrate how you can simplify styling by using functional CSS!

I used to hate writing CSS. I couldn’t make head nor tail of it. How do I structure my CSS file? When should I make a class? How do I vertically centre a div? !

These are just some of the questions that cropped up on a regular basis. I was afraid to make the slightest change to my styles, because it took soooo long to get them into a state I wanted! The whole thing just didn’t make sense to me.

I found some relief when I discovered component libraries such as Angular Material, Ionic, and Bootstrap. I was able to focus on developing functionality, rather than worrying about layout, button styles, and aligning divs.

All was rosy for a time, but a feeling began creeping in. I began to find component libraries very restrictive. The developers of the library decide what your app should look like, and you have very little say in it after that.

Plus, the best component libraries end up being the most popular, which results in many apps having the same look and feel. Everything becomes generic.

Don’t get me wrong, component libraries are great for building MVPs, because they take care of so much that doesn’t really add to your product. But what happens when you’ve outgrown the MVP? Can you see yourself ripping out Bootstrap and replacing it with custom CSS?

NOPE.

Functional CSS sheds a whole new light on the styling problem: you want your app to look great, but you don’t want to spend the next 3 weeks trying to centre a div (am I hung up on div centring?) .

In this article, I’ll explain what functional CSS is, how it differs from traditional CSS, and how to use it to simplify styling!

I’ve always hated writing CSS. I wonder about it: how do I organize my CSS files? When should I use class? How do I center a div vertically?

These are everyday problems, and they are only part of the equation. I dare not make a slight adjustment to my styles because it would take me a long, long time to adjust them to meet my expectations! All of this felt meaningless to me.

However, learning about component libraries such as Angular Material, Ionic, and Bootstrap has given me some relief — I can focus on functional development without worrying about layout, button styles, and div alignment.

It all seemed so optimistic, but after a while, a new feeling began to set in — I started to realize that these component libraries were too limited, and that the developers of these libraries were dictating what your application should look like without you having much say in it.

And because the best libraries end up being the most popular, the result is that many applications look the same and become popular.

Don’t get me wrong, component libraries are great for building MVP apps because they take into account a lot of things you don’t, but what happens when your MVP app gets too bloated? Do you find that you can use Bootstrap to pull out and customize?

Functional CSS casts a bright light on this styling problem: you want your application to look good, but you don’t want to spend three weeks doing “center a div” (am I being too nag about div centering?). .

So what exactly is functional CSS?

Look at the original

The definition of “functional” is:

Of or having a special activity, purpose, or task; relating to the way in which something works or operates.

Functions should do one thing, and, given the same input, should produce the same output.

Every.

Single.

Time.

With CSS, your classes should apply one visual effect (e.g. no underline), and apply that every single time. So your CSS becomes made up of many small parts, that can be composed to give a specific visual effect.

To demonstrate functional CSS, I’ve built a Trello Clone, Frello (original, I know…) , and created one branch with traditional CSS styles and another branch with functional CSS styling.

(If you want to jump ahead, check out Frello, and get the source code here)

Here’s a the card presentational component from the app, styled with both types of CSS. Take a look at the different CSS files and you’ll quickly notice the difference:

Belonging to or having a particular activity, purpose, or task; relating to the way in which something works or operates.

Functions should only do one thing, and should produce the same output each time given the same input.

In CSS, this means that your class should produce only one visual effect (for example, disable underlining) and should be applied separately each time it is needed. In this way, your CSS will be made up of many small pieces that can be used to weave a specific overall visual effect.

To demonstrate functional CSS, I built a copy of Trello, Frello, and created a traditional CSS style branch and a functional CSS style branch.

(If you want to learn more, you can check out a copy of the Frello code. The source address is here.)

Here is an example of a card component that uses both CSS types. Look at these two different CSS files and you’ll soon notice the difference:

Demo address: codesandbox. IO/s / 4 jpvpk3l2…

Look at the original

The first thing I want to point out is that the functional-styles file contains a lot more classes than the traditional-styles CSS file. And that probably seems overkill right now. Bear with me.

Say we now want to create a second component:

First I want to point out that the functional-styles. CSS file contains a lot more classes than the traditional-styles. CSS file, which may seem a little weird at first, but trust me as I move on.

Let’s now create another component:

Demo address: codesandbox. IO/s/qry5zmyq6…

Look at the original

You can see that the traditional CSS from both of these components has some duplication, but the functional CSS reuses some of the classes:

  • flex
  • items -center
  • dark-gray
  • helvetica
  • w5
  • ph2
  • bn
  • bg-transparent

That’s not an exhaustive list. There’s a lot of reuse going on here, and that’s only with two components. Imagine how much reuse would be going on with a whole apps worth of components!

  • flex
  • items-center
  • dark-gray
  • helvetica
  • w5
  • ph2
  • bn
  • bg-transparent

The list is too long to give you any examples. There’s a lot of reuse going on here, and that’s just with two components. Imagine if this were in the entire application, how much reuse would be possible? !

Tachyons framework

Look at the original

You might be thinking, how do I write all of these functional css blocks? ! How do I know which ones I need???

The great news is, YOU DON’T HAVE TO! Someone else has done it for you! There are a handful of libraries that contain most of the classes you’ll ever need. Yeah, sure, they’re not exhaustive, they don’t cover every possible style that you might want to apply, but the large majority of useful effects are there.

Tachyons is one such library. I’ve used it in a few projects, and found it to be incredibly useful.

To demonstrate how effective Tachyons is at speeding up your workflow, I timed how long I spent working on each aspect of the Frello app:

  • Functionality
  • Styling:
    • Traditional CSS
    • Functional CSS using Tachyons

Here are the results:

  • Functionality – 3 h 10 m
  • Traditional CSS-3H 44M
  • Functional CSS using Tachyon – 1h 59m

By far, traditional CSS took the longest time to do. It even took more time than building the functionality of the app! Maybe this says more about my ability to write plain CSS than anything else, but it’s clear that styling Frello with functional CSS was a much quicker process.

I spent almost twice as much time writing traditional CSS compared to adding Tachyons classes to components. The glaring difference here is that I didn’t actually have to write much CSS when using Tachyons. If I’d written all the functional CSS classes from scratch, I expect it would’ve taken a lot longer.

You have nothing to worry about! Someone else has done it for you! There are already a number of very useful third-party libraries that have many of the classes you need. Of course, they’re certainly not comprehensive enough to cover all the styles you might need, but most of the useful styles are already out there.

Tachyons is such a library! I’ve used it on several projects and found it really useful.

To demonstrate how effective Tachyons are at speeding up our workflow, I ran time tests on various aspects of developing the Frello app, including:

  • functional
  • style
    • Traditional style
    • Use Tachyons functional CSS

Here are their results:

  • Functional – 3H 10m
  • Traditional CSS-3H 44M
  • Use tachyons-based functional CSS-1H 59m

As you can see, the traditional CSS area is by far the longest, even surpassing the time spent on functional development! Maybe it has something to do with my ability to write pure CSS, but it still shows how much faster it is to use functional CSS for styling.

It took me almost twice as long to write traditional CSS as it did to style components by adding Tachyons’ various classes. The biggest difference when using Tychyons is that I don’t have to write a lot of actual CSS. If I were to write all my functional CSS from scratch, it would take a long time.

Why should we care?

Look at the original

So what I’m trying to advocate here is taking advantage of the work that others have done in building functional CSS libraries. They’re built on solid foundations in design, people have spent many hours thinking about how these libraries should be built, and what the most useful classes will be.

And it’s not just the classes that are useful, but the fundamental design principles behind Tachyons. All of Tachyons spacing and sizing classes (think margin, padding, and font-size) are based on scales.

To be precise, Tachyons use ‘rem’ for all sizes and spaces making them relative to your apps root font-size. The default root font-size is 16px, so if you don’t change this you’ll have a four-based scale, meaning all spaces and sizes are multiples of four.

Apple and Google use a four-based scale in their products, and they know a thing or two about design!

“Using a consistent spacing scale also promotes maintainability through ratios by making layouts more predictable and more likely to “fit” and align well.” — Jina Anne, DesignBetter.Co

This is important because it gives rhythm and balance to your design and layout.

Tachyons focuses not only on the usefulness of its classes, but also on the fundamental design philosophy behind them — all of Tachyons’ sizing and spacing classes (such as margin, padding, and font-size) are scalable.

To be more precise, Tachyons use “REM” units for size and space, allowing them to scale based on the font size of the application root element. The default font size for the root element is 16px, so if you leave it alone it means you’ll get “four-based” scaling, with all Spaces and dimensions being multiples of four.

Apple and Google, after all, know how to design, and they use four-based scaling in their products!

“Adopting a consistent space ratio makes layouts more predictable, adaptable and scalable, which improves maintainability.” — Jina Anne, DesignBetter.Co

This is important because it gives rules and balance points about design and layout.

Using scales also helps you avoid magic numbers. Those constant numbers that hang around in your CSS and make things “work”.

This scaling layer can also avoid the “magic number” problem.

Look at the original

Another key advantage of using a functional CSS is library is that it can speed up your development workflow by reducing tab-switching. This is particularly noticeable when using a framework such as React, where your templates are inside your JS files.

With functional CSS, you can write the functionality, build the template, and style your component in a single file! As I demonstrated above, this can significantly reduce the time you spend building a component, while maintaining high quality output.

With functional CSS, functionality, templates, and styles can all be written in one file! As I showed earlier, this can significantly reduce the time it takes to build a component without compromising the quality of the output.

Tachyons Schmachyons

Look at the original

“> < span style =” max-width: 100%; clear: both; min-height: 1em; If you need to update a button that’s used all over your app, you’ll have the change the class on every single instance of that button!” — Developer friend of mine

This is a very valid concern. But I’d say to this, review the way you’re building the app. If you have the same button throughout your app, then make it a component. Insert the component everywhere you need it, and when you want to update its styles, change the classes on the component!

There are a lot of classes in Tachyons, and it can be difficult to know which one you need to apply at first. And it can be difficult to know what the class even does.

What does “bn” do? Or is “fw7” for that matter?

Tachyons documentation is useful, but can be difficult to navigate, especially if you’re trying to find out what a particular class does.

Luckily, there’s a very useful tool, Tachyons TLDR, that can help you get to grips with many aspects of Tachyons, including the class names and the scale system. Personally, I found it very useful.

Another common complaint about functional CSS libraries is that they’re very opinionated, and only offer you a limited selection of classes.

If you’ve struggled with this, I have good news! You can customize Tachyons, and generate a stylesheet based on your own config using tachyons-generator!

There are other functional CSS libraries available, some of which are highly customizable:

  • Tailwind
  • Basscss
  • BuzzFeed’s Solid

There are options available for you to get the functional CSS library that suits your needs.

“But functional CSS is not scalable… If you need to update a button, you need to change the class of all instances of that button!” — From a developer friend of mine

The concern is very normal, but I want to say is, please review the way you build an application: if in your application with the same button, then put it into a component, where needed to be inserted, and then when you need to update its style, it is ok to modify the component class!

There are many classes in Tachyons, so it is difficult to know which one to use before using it. It is also difficult to know exactly what each class does. For example, what does “BN” do? Or what does fw7 do?

While you can check out the Tachyons documentation, it’s a bit harder to use, especially if you’re trying to figure out what a class does.

Fortunately, there is a very useful tool available, Tachyons TLDR, that can help us understand many aspects of Tachyons, including the naming of classes and their scaling hierarchy. Anyway, from my point of view, I think it’s very useful.

If you’re having trouble with Tachyons’ design, you can customize Tachyons by using the Tachyons-Generator to create styles based on your own configuration.

There are other functional CSS libraries available, some of which support a high degree of customization:

  • Tailwind
  • Basscss
  • BuzzFeed’s Solid

There’s always one of these for you.

Embrace functional CSS

Look at the original

So why do it yourself if you don’t have to? Spend your energy building functionality in your apps, not writing CSS that’s probably a near duplicate of another CSS class you wrote in some other project.

Save time in your workflow by reducing tab-switching, and apply solid design principles to your work without spending the next 4-years getting a degree in design.

Bring Tachyons with you, or any other functional CSS library for that matter, and simplify styling!

If you don’t, why do it yourself! Focus on building functionality for your application, rather than writing duplicate CSS classes that might be highly similar to classes in other projects.

By reducing tag switching and adopting solid design principles, you can save time in your workflow and not spend another “4 years” improving your design capabilities.

Put On Tachyons — or any other functional CSS library for that matter — and start simplifying your styling.

The related resources

  • Frello application
  • Frello application source code
  • Tachyons document
  • A brief introduction to Tachyons